I started my journalism program at Michigan State thinking that I would focus mostly on environmental reporting. As I progressed in the program, I realized that it wasn’t such a good fit. Most news organizations are dissolving their teams of environmental reporters, if not removing science from their coverage altogether. The New York Times does an excellent job at it, but – as a privately owned paper – they operate much differently than newspapers and television stations that are part of huge corporations.

The second reason I strayed is because environmental journalism is almost always about large-scale problems and disasters that seem irresolvable. For example, global warming has become one of the top concerns of the human race. But even if there is a multinational effort to reduce the amount of carbon emissions and take other necessary precautions, the effects of human pollution might already be too pervasive.
This presents a problem for the journalism industry, because the audience has a tendency to become desensitized when it is presented with overwhelmingly negative news on a regular basis. People do need a shock in order to change their habits and, say, stop throwing those pop cans in the trash (this is a common act in states where you don’t get the 10 cent deposit back). But when faced with too much shock, people just reel in terror.
People also need to feel that they can make a difference (i.e. – self-efficacy), and that any behavior changes won’t harm their lifestyle or priorities. I think that a combination of shock and empowerment have led to some significant improvements over the past few years. If everyone switches from incandescent bulbs to the twisty fluorescent ones, that could mean a drastic reduction in electric bills and, therefore, usage of coal at power plants. It’s a small step, but a beneficial one.
The other danger is that words, ideas, and actions that were once revolutionary can become watered-down clichés. Many businesses these days advertise “green” or “eco-friendly” practices, without actually living up to or providing any credible evidence for their claims. How do we pick apart the honest companies from the fraudulent ones?
In our first meeting at Ingenex Digital Marketing, we were given the tasks of finding out how to increase the size and scope of the internship, and how to make the internship more eco-friendly. I think I’ll come up with more ideas once I get a better understanding of what digital marketing actually entails (during my two tours in a university, I never had a class in marketing, advertising, or business). However, as I think of ideas to make the internship more eco-friendly, I will keep in mind the necessity of combining shock and self-efficacy to produce real results in the target audience. (Please visit my personal Digital Marketing Blog for updates on my Eco-Friendly Internship experience.)