<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s New TOS: Resistance is futile?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecofriendlyinternship.com/facebooks-new-tos-resistance-is-futile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecofriendlyinternship.com/facebooks-new-tos-resistance-is-futile/</link>
	<description>Building Digital Marketing Skills And Helping the Environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Maurer</title>
		<link>http://www.ecofriendlyinternship.com/facebooks-new-tos-resistance-is-futile/comment-page-1/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>John Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecofriendlyinternship.com/?p=908#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now, I&#039;m no big city lawyer, but&quot; - Hilarious! I read into this after seeing a message from the Book about how they changed their privacy settings and feeling a bit Orwellian. I&#039;m sure plenty of groups have already popped up about the topic but I want to see them reverse their policy, it&#039;s wrong on so many levels. 
Sure, part of their advertising platform relies on having valuable demo/psychographics that marketers chomp at the bit for but Mark Zuckerberg should have thought about that when he passed up a multi-billion dollar offer from Google a couple of years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now, I&#8217;m no big city lawyer, but&#8221; &#8211; Hilarious! I read into this after seeing a message from the Book about how they changed their privacy settings and feeling a bit Orwellian. I&#8217;m sure plenty of groups have already popped up about the topic but I want to see them reverse their policy, it&#8217;s wrong on so many levels.<br />
Sure, part of their advertising platform relies on having valuable demo/psychographics that marketers chomp at the bit for but Mark Zuckerberg should have thought about that when he passed up a multi-billion dollar offer from Google a couple of years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

